A modern programming language that makes developers happier.

kotlinlang

Is there any rhyme or reason to when inline classes are mapped to their underlying type in objective-c versus being mapped to id?
For context, we’re trying to use an inline class as a non-null property in another DTO

This line in the interop doc seems to suggest it’s at least _sometimes_ possible to represent as the underlying type
&gt; • inline classes (arguments are mapped as either underlying primitive type or `id`)
However, any implementation I’ve tried seems to result in a type of `id` being exposed in the XCFramework

I think it was somehow related to generics.

Our guidelines prohibit the usages of value classes in public API