A modern programming language that makes developers happier.

kotlinlang

The OpenSavvy fleet is migrating from JVM toolchains to <https://github.com/GradleUp/Tapmoc|Tapmoc> :eyes:

Cool! I've been thinking of doing the same for our projects, but for whatever reason, I wasn't feeling comfortable in doing so. :sweat_smile: How has the migration been?

<@U79JY5TL3> helped me do it, but honestly it was pretty seamless. You can find the full changes <https://gitlab.com/opensavvy/automation/gradle-conventions/-/commit/efff7fafc44f0c42eace6b4036b08367e0a58559|in our conventions repo>.

The main reason we wanted to go through it is because we are constantly being rate-limited by FooJay, so our CI fails often for no reason.

I'm happy to help if you have any question <@U029E3E4LJ2>

<@UFGCACPE0> <@U79JY5TL3> Hi friends! Just passing by to mention that we successfully migrated a project to using `tapmoc` , and now I am including it in other projects as well. It's been pretty smooth, thanks! :gratitude-thank-you: The only "caveat" (and this is not `tapmoc`'s fault) is that now I need to explicitly mention the `jvmTarget` to `detekt` (I suspect it used to rely on `jvmToolchain`), but it's just a 3-line addition. :wink: Cheerio!

&gt; I suspect it used to rely on `jvmToolchain` 
probably worth a feature request if it's the case

<@U79JY5TL3> I noticed `detekt` gets the value for the JVM target from the compiler configuration, so that would explain why things just work when `jvmToolchain` is used. :wink: I am happy to set the value manually, but it could be an interesting feature. Thanks for considering! _(and of course for working and maintaining such cool project!)_

&gt; JVM target from the compiler configuration,
I would expect this to match what tapmoc is using :thinking_face:

Do you happen to have the place in detekt where this is done?

<@U029E3E4LJ2>, did you get an error like
```Invalid value passed to --jvm-target, expected one of ...```
?

If that's the case, I think this is fixed in Detekt 2.0. At least I haven't been able to reproduce there

<@U79JY5TL3> Yes, that's the error I get. :sweat_smile: Apologies, I haven't tested the 2.x branch yet (I think it's still in alpha), but I am happy to try! So sorry for the noise! (also <@UFGCACPE0> sorry for "hijacking" your thread :sweat_smile:)

Ahah no worries, it was a thread to advertise Tapmoc anyway, this is on topic