which, of course, works

# announcements

[pavel]

which, of course, works

[ghedeon]

in theory, if your function is tailrec than it's compiled into a loop and could be inlined. But I'm afraid the inline tailrec is not supported yet.

[SOFe]

@pavel you might be interested in this new answer by me: https://stackoverflow.com/a/54692556/3990767

[SOFe]

It does not require tail recursion, but suffers from creation of anonymous classes

[SOFe]

I personally consider it as a bad practice to declare an anonymous class inside an inline function though

[SOFe]

but this is where you need it

[SOFe]

hmm, looking at it again, maybe it's more or less the same as the first answer's first method

[pavel]

Yeah, it’s more or less the same. I went with something similar. It’s not aesthetically pleasing, but it works