How experimental is @Parcelize Android extension? ...
# androida
ashishkrishnan
05/31/2018, 10:38 AMHow experimental is @Parcelize Android extension? Someone using in production?
👍 3
g
gildor
05/31/2018, 11:16 AMIt's stable enough, I don't know any significant bugs. Use it in production
k
kenkyee
05/31/2018, 1:08 PMOnly problem I know if is you can't ignore fields from parceling. I filed a ticket for it
g
gildor
05/31/2018, 1:16 PM@kenkyee But you can. there is annotation @IgnoredOnParcel
a
ashishkrishnan
05/31/2018, 1:37 PM@gildor that's amazing to know
@IgnoredOnParcelk
kenkyee
05/31/2018, 5:56 PMthat's what I filed a bug on @gildor 🙂
https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-24459
kenkyee
05/31/2018, 5:56 PMdoesn't work...
kenkyee
05/31/2018, 5:56 PMat least not the way I want to use it
g
gildor
06/01/2018, 1:00 AMSo, you trying to use it with constructor parameters? Yeah, it doesn’t work like that, only for class fields
k
kenkyee
06/01/2018, 2:10 AMYep... Would be useful for data classes
kenkyee
06/01/2018, 2:10 AMI couldn't get it to work with class fields either
g
gildor
06/01/2018, 2:12 AMBut how this suppose to work? Use default value instead? So default value would be required for @IgnoreOnParcel constructor property?
k
kenkyee
06/01/2018, 3:16 PMyes...I would expect default value to be used if it's not parceled...it's how I'd write the code by hand.
2 Views