Huh? They are mangled? Than what's the point of re...
# language-proposalsk
karelpeeters
10/30/2018, 1:25 PMHuh? They are mangled? Than what's the point of restricting inline classes to not have constructors? I thought the argument was that Java interop could always work around them.
g
gildor
10/30/2018, 1:31 PMBut inline classes has constructor. Do you mean init block?
Because this restriction was introduced before mangling
And mangling opens the door fir init blocks in inline classes, it's not implemented yet, see inline classes KEEP and discussion there
k
karelpeeters
10/30/2018, 1:34 PMNon trivial constructor, so yeah init blocks.
gildor
10/30/2018, 1:38 PMgildor
10/30/2018, 1:39 PMgildor
10/30/2018, 1:40 PMI actually would like to see private constructors even more than init blocks
k
karelpeeters
10/30/2018, 2:07 PMYeah both are pretty important, thanks for the links!
a
Andreas Sinz
11/01/2018, 9:43 AMalso private constructors for inline classes!
k
karelpeeters
11/01/2018, 9:44 AMYeah that's exactly what this is about.