what about changing the `-` to `_` in order to all...
# language-proposalse
elect
10/30/2018, 1:01 PMwhat about changing the
-_o
orangy
10/30/2018, 1:14 PM
That’s the point, it shouldn’t be callable.
e
elect
10/30/2018, 1:21 PMwhy?
e
elizarov
10/30/2018, 5:14 PMBecause we plan to allow private constructors and init blocks in the future, but the carrier type is exposed to java, so we need a level of protection to avoid Java code passing unsanitized values of inline classes to inline accepting functions. You can always work around by defining a bridge function in Kotlin that does not take inline classes in parameters.
🎉 3
e
elect
11/01/2018, 10:41 AMthis is a blocker for projects using massively inline classes, because it means essentially doubling the code..
d
Dico
11/02/2018, 4:24 PMPerhaps a compiler argument that automatically generates boxed versions of the functions and exposes them to java would be an option?
e
elect
11/04/2018, 9:00 AMoh yes
2 Views