A modern programming language that makes developers happier.

kotlinlang

<@U2E974ELT> How will that help with awaiting for the first actually successful coroutine? Never failing one will still have to return something — some "empty" value I guess. Or do you mean keeping this approach but simplifying it by calling self in `onAwait` instead of `catch` in the case `result` is "empty"?
I'm actually interested in the failures in some cases, so I need to somehow pass them through anyway to inspect them later.