^ Heres a PR for this <https://github.com/arrow-kt...
# arrow-contributors
t
^ Heres a PR for this https://github.com/arrow-kt/arrow-fx/pull/279 I’m rebuilding after it failed on a stream Cancellation test (and confirmed it passes locally) so it’s either flaky or there is a bug for a particular input. I don’t think that failure is related to my changes because I didn’t see
parMapN
being used in
parJoin
but I didn’t dig through it exhaustively. https://github.com/arrow-kt/arrow-fx/pull/279/checks?check_run_id=1082708601
Tests passed on pr!
r
Congrats @tavish pegram, thank you so much!! It will be reviewed/merged after the release (tomorrow)
t
Cool, I might get a head start on implementing n = 4-9 so its ready to go right after. Thanks!
🎉 1
r
Awesome, thanks to you! 🙌