A modern programming language that makes developers happier.

kotlinlang

*On the debouncing of text fields*

I have a `BasicTextField` whose `onValueChange` does two things:
1. Feeds `onValueChange`’s value back to the `BasicTextField` to display what the user has typed.
2. Triggers an HTTP search call to fetch updated data to be displayed.
I’d like to debounce 2. but not 1. but: since the `onValueChange` is a single callback I see no “easy” way to do it.
Were I to debounce the whole `onValueChange` callback, the user will notice a lag with the on screen feedback too.

I believe this is a pretty common use case so I’m wondering if there’s a compose friendly pattern to handle this or if something ad-hoc must be concocted.

It is smelly to be doing any sort of HTTP stuff from your composables anyway. I would fire text change events to a view model of some sort, and then that model can debounce the events it receives (e.g. using rx/flow operators or something else).

Yeah that’s what I’m doing, the text change event is sent down to the business logic component which deals with state management and http calls (pure kotlin code, no android).

But I thought this kind of debouncing should happen at the earliest possible in the “chain” which in this case is in the UI layer (though this is debatable of course).

You can debounce wherever you like after setting the new value.
```onValueChange = {
    value = it
    debounce(value)
}```

&gt; I thought this kind of debouncing should happen at the earliest possible in the “chain” which in this case is in the UI layer (though this is debatable of course).
Why? You’ve described a very good reason why _not_ to do this. Another reason is responsibility – if the same view model were used with different UI, the same debouncing logic would probably need to be applied. If that logic is in the UI layer like you propose, then you’d have to duplicate/rewrite it. It would also probably be a _lot_ easier to unit test the debouncing logic if it’s in your view model.

Lol. It is cool that you managed to highlight a blatant contradiction in my own thinking (that I was too blind to notice while writing). Sometimes my mind likes to play these kind of tricks to itself. Result: I get stuck in a loop.

Or perhaps... this is just the way I used to do it with the legacy View system: since `EditText` manages its own internal state I could always debounce it on the UI side using `afterTextCange` without affecting the text fed back to the UI.