<@U0M0EAG90> I too have notice this. I have just b...
# http4ks
scap
02/27/2018, 4:46 AM@elifarley I too have notice this. I have just been living with it but would like to be able to name the object. I haven't found a way.
e
elifarley
02/27/2018, 5:05 AMGood to know I'm not the only one 😉
d
dave
02/27/2018, 7:29 AMYou can pass the override for the definitionId when defining the response.
dave
02/27/2018, 7:32 AMThe reason for the weird name is that we autogenerate the names from the hashcode of the object. This ensures that there is only one copy of any particular model generated.
dave
02/27/2018, 7:33 AMAlso, if you give them your own name, you have to manage the names yourself
as opposed to having the library do it.
dave
02/27/2018, 7:33 AMThis override is only available for the top level object.
e
elifarley
02/27/2018, 2:10 PMIn fact, I think the current behavior is sensible, but in my specific case, I'd rather have a user-friendly name.
d
dave
02/27/2018, 2:31 PMI'm not actually sure what the overall effect is from a API user perspective of having those weird names. I suppose that he names in the swagger UI might be different, but that's about it I think. As I said, you don't achieve the full power of the JSON schema if you override the names, because you might introduce duplication and/or erroneous overrides into the set of schemas.
e
elifarley
02/27/2018, 2:35 PMI couldn't get it right...
Copy code
returning(ResponseMeta("Product information in JSON", Response(OK).with(
productInfoBody of ProductInfo.dummy
), "product-info")) Copy code
"200": {
"description": "Product information in JSON",
"schema": null
},elifarley
02/27/2018, 2:36 PMWeird... I've reverted to the old code, and the result is the same schema: null !!! It was working earlier today...
What could be wrong? Here's the previous code:
Copy code
returning("Product information in JSON" to Response(OK).with(
productInfoBody of ProductInfo.dummy
))d
dave
02/27/2018, 2:39 PMhave you upgraded the version?
dave
02/27/2018, 2:39 PMnot that that's bad - just useful!
e
elifarley
02/27/2018, 2:39 PMnope, AFAIK I have just changed the parameter to a ResponseMeta !!
elifarley
02/27/2018, 2:40 PMWell, I only slept for 4 hours today... maybe that's it
elifarley
02/27/2018, 2:40 PMI guess I'll put a breakpoint on the part of the code that renders the API doc
d
dave
02/27/2018, 2:43 PMthis is the syntax from the test that we use to test the override, so should definitely work!
Copy code
returning(ResponseMeta("peachy",
Response(ACCEPTED).with(customBody of Argo.obj("anAnotherObject" to Argo.obj("aNumberField" to Argo.number(123)))), "someDefinitionId"))dave
02/27/2018, 2:44 PMyou can replace the Argo with Jackson or Gson as appropraite
e
elifarley
02/27/2018, 2:46 PMyep, it was working just a few hours ago... hehehe
elifarley
02/27/2018, 2:46 PMok, let me debug it to find out what I did differently now